#MORI SEIKI SOFTWARE#

Thank you so much for taking the time to work on the post. I'm also only 25 years old, and just opened my shop in January of this year, so my funds are also limited. It's only $4K, and judging from what I've seen its the best deal. For being almost 50 years old, it still has almost all of the paint, and even the paint on the inside. Comes with a computer to load the programs into/edit programs, and its been retrofitted and currently is up and running. Further, the 'X' is a negative, which is more unique to that generation of controls Looking at your sample code, it appears to be a mixture of incremental moves for the cutting, but an absolute value for the retract. The differences extend beyond the decimal places and the feedrate. Just trying to make sure the post would be doing the right output. One of my coworkers (on vacation until tuesday) has been a lathe guy longer than I've been alive (36+yrs) and he knows a thing or 2 about how the old lathes were programmed. I will pick away at the post a bit as I have time. Sorry for the tangent, back on track now: Unless this lathe is really inexpensive.īut still, a bubble control is not a fun prospect, even if you really know what you are doing Even a Yasnac MX2 would be a huge upgrade. So, you don't actually own the lathe but it is one you are looking at purchasing? My honest opinion? Spend a bit more money and find something with a better control. For starters, anything else (software) you would be using will require a significant amount of post editing to get it to the stage you need.

#MORI SEIKI SOFTWARE#

I would seriously not worry about the software side of things. Yep, what works in HSM/Inventor will work in Fusion So, once you have the info mentioned above, might I suggest you pose your question to This Forum The Post forum deals with post modifications and creations for all AutoDesk platforms, as they actually all share the same post processor format. Lathes are not in any way shape or form my strong point, but I still want to do what I can to at least point you in the right track. All this isn't required, per se, but is very handy to haveģ) The ability to test out posts on a somewhat frequent basis and relay your resultsĤ) Additional info, such as what generic posts you have tried out and descriptive details about the errors encounteredĪll that being said. This is very helpful, as it gives the post writers and modification people something concrete to go by while they massage the post to reflect what has already run successfully.Ģ) A list of accepted G and M codes, as well as other statements such as Feed callouts, special cycles that are unique to that machine, general program formatting, use of R or I,J,K. To do so, a few things must be known first:ġ) PROVEN Sample code. The Fusion 360 Post Processor is widely adapted and customized to suit the needs of almost any machine control out there.

Mori seiki